(From U.S.A. Today)
Newspaper advertising was my primary career for twenty plus years, so I'm well aware of how arbitrary and oft times stupid the managers can be about what they will and won't accept as advertising in their publications. I've gone to the mat more than once for an advertiser caught between the prejudices of small minded men and good common sense or even good taste. Granted, sometimes there are legal considerations that the publisher must be aware of that the advertiser has little concern about, but I can't see any of these problems with the above ad and its related copy. Rolling Stone, a news/magazine that I've often praised over the years for its forward thinking approach to the world of the young adult and teen, has finally shown that it has lost not only its edge, but its collective mind as well. Perhaps its time has now come and gone. Does anyone really care anymore what Rolling Stone thinks, or is it one more leftover of a bygone era? How 'bout if everyone just didn't buy the February issue of Rolling Stone in which the ad was originally scheduled to appear?
10 total comments.
Posted by Anonymous:
Posted by birdwoman:
There was nothing about music there. It was all politics and stupid Paris Hilton entertainment stuff.
Never again will I open a copy of that tripe.
(*)>
Posted by Wendy:
Posted by Jessie:
Posted by Martin:
Posted by Jules:
Posted by tomharper:
Sorry, conservatives are the moneylenders that Jesus drove away from the temple.
Buh Bye.
Posted by frstlymil:
Posted by Scott C. Smith:
Doesn't "Rollng Stone" have the right not to run the ad? I guess not.
Posted by tomharper:
What is God's world coming to?!?!?!?
Comments